seg\u00fan se informa<\/a> descubri\u00f3 algunas deficiencias en la Easee Home. Entre otras cosas, la estaci\u00f3n no super\u00f3 una prueba de sobretensi\u00f3n y le faltaba un disyuntor de corriente residual, fallos todos ellos que plantean graves riesgos de seguridad, lo que llev\u00f3 a la autoridad sueca a plantearse una prohibici\u00f3n de venta.<\/p>\nEasee hab\u00eda respondido a las acusaciones y consider\u00f3 que la prueba de sobretensi\u00f3n fallida con la clavija CP no era aplicable en su interpretaci\u00f3n de la norma IEC, afirmando que la clavija CP estaba instalada de tal forma que no se pod\u00eda tocar. Y con el RCD, Easee no conf\u00eda en un dispositivo independiente montado en un carril DIN, sino en un sistema \"integrado en el dise\u00f1o general del cargador\". Si el sensor integrado detecta fallos de CA y CC, el sistema se dispara y se supone que corta inmediatamente el suministro el\u00e9ctrico, lo que, seg\u00fan la interpretaci\u00f3n de Easee, garantiza la funci\u00f3n de un RCD.<\/p>\n
El Els\u00e4lerhetverket a\u00fan no ha hecho ning\u00fan comentario. La p\u00e1gina web s\u00f3lo dice que se ha recibido la declaraci\u00f3n y que publicar\u00e1n su informe final sobre las seis cajas murales probadas en unas semanas.<\/p>\n
Esa era la historia hasta ahora. Sin embargo, un representante del Comit\u00e9 Internacional de Normalizaci\u00f3n se ha unido al debate. Christoph Erni es miembro del comit\u00e9 que desarrolla la norma internacional para los sistemas de carga conductiva para VE (IEC 61851). Tambi\u00e9n es el director general del fabricante suizo de infraestructuras de recarga Juice Technology. Es una pr\u00e1ctica habitual que los representantes de la industria contribuyan a las normas. Sin embargo, cabe destacar aqu\u00ed que Erni no es s\u00f3lo un representante de la ICE, sino tambi\u00e9n el jefe de un competidor de Easee.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La disputa en torno a las cajas murales del fabricante noruego Easee no amaina, despu\u00e9s de que la empresa respondiera a las cuestiones de seguridad planteadas por la Swedish Electrical<\/p>","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":187880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9933],"tags":[5755,16771,10174,27532,23714,10165,27533,1580],"class_list":["post-189075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy-infrastructure","tag-ac","tag-background","tag-charging-stations","tag-christoph-erni","tag-easee","tag-iec","tag-iec-61851","tag-wallbox"],"acf":{"inhalt_teil2":"
In his statement, Erni primarily cites two critical errors in the Easee arguments. “The 61851-1 standard prescribes extra low voltage (SELV or PELV) for the CP circuit. A defined insulation voltage test must be fulfilled for this,” says Erni. “The indication that the CP pin cannot be touched does not cancel this requirement under any circumstances.”<\/p>\n
Regarding the RCD, Erni does not fundamentally contradicts Easee and its integrated circuit instead of a separate RCD, but he does point out a technical detail. As a Mode 3 charging station permanently connected to the mains, the Easee Home falls into overvoltage category 3. “This requires a contact gap of at least 3 mm for the switching relays,” says Erni. “However, the relays used have a contact gap of only 2.3 mm. They may be smaller and cheaper than correct components, but they clearly do not meet the regulations.”<\/p>\n
Devices certified according to EN 61008-1 and IEC 62955 must also safely separate short-circuit currents. “The relays installed cannot do exactly this reliably. If the contacts weld, there is no separation, and the RCD can no longer function. There is a danger to life,” says the executive.<\/p>\n
His clear conclusion: “The statement reveals insufficient technical expertise and a disregard for customer safety on the part of the manufacturer, in which he modifies mandatory standard tests as it sees fit or simply omits them.” Since Easee labelled its stations with a CE mark despite the “deliberate and intentional” non-compliance with safety-relevant standard tests, it was “thus abusive and misleading, legally speaking precisely falsifying documents”, Erni said.<\/p>\n
Source: Info by e-mail, with reporting by Sebastian Schaal, Germany.<\/em><\/p>\n"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189075"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":223466,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189075\/revisions\/223466"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/187880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electrive.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}