Es probable que la tercera licitaci\u00f3n de 4.675 autobuses el\u00e9ctricos para la India, publicada en enero de 2023, sea un fracaso. Al parecer, no hubo mucho inter\u00e9s por parte de la industria, debido al modelo de financiaci\u00f3n elegido en la licitaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n
Seg\u00fan informa Est\u00e1ndar empresarial<\/em>, en esta ronda de licitaciones no se recibieron ofertas de OEM establecidos como Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland y PMI Electro Mobility. La falta de participaci\u00f3n de los principales OEM hab\u00eda dado lugar a varias pr\u00f3rrogas del plazo de licitaci\u00f3n, que finalmente concluy\u00f3 el 9 de junio.<\/p>\n \"Como ninguno de los OEM present\u00f3 ofertas, es probable que se deseche la licitaci\u00f3n. Tambi\u00e9n estamos considerando revisar el modelo de contrataci\u00f3n de arrendamiento sin tripulaci\u00f3n para futuras licitaciones\", confirm\u00f3 un funcionario del gobierno.<\/p>\n Los 4.675 autobuses el\u00e9ctricos de esta tercera licitaci\u00f3n del CESL deb\u00edan desplegarse en tres estados, concretamente en Delhi, Kerala y Telangana. Los autobuses deb\u00edan adquirirse de forma centralizada y luego proporcionarse a los operadores de transporte como un servicio por el que pagar\u00edan una determinada cantidad por kil\u00f3metro durante doce a\u00f1os. Esto es precisamente lo que puede haber llevado al fracaso de la licitaci\u00f3n.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Es probable que la tercera licitaci\u00f3n de 4.675 autobuses el\u00e9ctricos para la India, publicada en enero de 2023, sea un fracaso. Al parecer, no hab\u00eda mucho inter\u00e9s por parte de los<\/p>","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":205436,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9942],"tags":[4509,3701,23825,3976,10799,10090,25287,28719,13224,4572,17953],"class_list":["post-205455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fleets","tag-ashok-leyland","tag-bev","tag-cesl","tag-delhi","tag-electric-buses","tag-india","tag-kerala","tag-pmi-electro-mobility","tag-public-transport","tag-tata-motors","tag-telangana"],"acf":{"inhalt_teil2":" According to the sources of Business Standard<\/em>, most manufacturers were concerned “about high operational costs, the financial instability of state transport undertakings (STUs), and apprehensions about relinquishing control of the buses to STU drivers.” In addition, the interest in handing over control of the buses to the state transport companies was low. And: as reported, the transport companies were to have access to the FAME II subsidies, but not the manufacturers – which in turn would have made it more expensive for them.<\/p>\n This choice of the funding system apparently meant that most of the major manufacturers did not participate. According to the report, there was only one bid from EKA by Pinnalce Mobility Solutions. However, when questioned by Business Standard<\/em>, EKA would not comment on the bid.<\/p>\n